October 14, 2007
RE: Your Oath of Office and Possible Acts of Treason
Dear United States Representative and Fellow Citizen:
This is an update and summary of some of the strongest publicly available evidence that implicates top officials in the US government for carrying out heinous crimes against humanity in a false flag attack against innocent US civilians on 9/11/01. A similar letter was sent to every member of the US Senate on September 20, 2007.
Despite any proclamations of “not knowing” or “ignorance of the facts” that may be presented as a defense at a future trial, any United States Representative in Congress who continues to support the current administration and its various illegal activities and occupations after having knowledge of the evidence presented in this letter today is tantamount to nothing short of treason and a violation of an oath to protect the US Constitution from enemies from within.
1. The planes were probably not hijacked on 9/11/01, at least not as claimed. If they were, it would have been the first successful hijackings of 757’s and 767’s in the history of the aircraft . Effective anti-hijacking capabilities were available long before 2001 and may have been installed in all 757’s and 767’s at the time of the purported hijackings.
Sources:
- http://www.airsafe.com/events/hijack.htm
- http://www.911-strike.com/remote_bb.htm
2. The plane that hit WTC2 may not have been a regular commercial airliner, and/or the facades of WTC2 where the plane hit may have somehow been modified, because the plane apparently pierced right through the building with its nose mostly still in tact as it came out the other side.
Sources:
- http://www.archive.org/details/cnn200109110848-0929 (see time marker 21:20)
- http://tinyurl.com/ysscje (see time markers 6:30, 5:25, and 4:55)- http://www.archive.org/details/abc200109110912-0954 (see time markers 0:58-1:04 and 1:56-2:06 for what appears to be a piece of the plane on fire hanging outside WTC2)
- http://shoes4industry.blogspot.com (see the October 10, 2007, video posting and comments therein)
3. It is highly improbable for each of the world trade center towers to be so completely dustified, and in such a short time span (10-15 seconds), without some input of energy other than from gravity.
Sources:
- http://drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BilliardBalls.html
- http://www.911blogger.com/node/9154
- Any physics textbook discussion on conservation of mass, energy, and momentum.
4. There are countless observations that are consistent with the idea that a chemical breakdown of materials, especially iron and steel, occurred (or continued to occur) after the world trade center towers had been destroyed.
Sources:
- http://www.archive.org/details/nbc200109110954-1036 (see time markers 4:45-5:05 and 7:14-7:20 and beyond for what appears to be the beginning and the continuation, respectively, of a possible chemical breakdown or “fuming” of the mostly-steel leeward facade of WTC1 just after a seemingly reactive dust cloud from the destruction of WTC2 came in contact with it).
- http://www.archive.org/details/cnn200109111011-1053 (see time marker 17:15-17:30 for what appears to be a steel spire turning to dust after the destruction of WTC1; also see http://tinyurl.com/2c2aep for a close up view of the same video clip).- http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/New_Spire/
- http://www.drjudywood.com (see photo evidence and audio discussions of observed “fuming” and “toasted car” phenomena, including possible acts of covering up evidence of fuming phenomena with dirt, debris, and the spread of inaccurate, misleading information about the purported discovery of “molten steel” during the clean-up at ground zero)
- http://www.stevenwarran.blogspot.com (additional photo evidence of possible fuming and toasted car phenomena and possible cover-up of the phenomena with dirt at the Pentagon).
5. As one of many alternative explanations, technology exists that would allow the inconspicuous coating of much of the steel frame interior of the WTC towers with explosive material (say instead of the purported fire protective coating that was continuously being “re-applied” throughout the lives of the buildings), a material that may later have been triggered with a laser from a remote location.
Sources:
- http://fdi03754139.info/911_related/nanothermite_explosion_thesis (nanoparticle-sized thermite is one possible laser-triggered explosive material)
- http://tinyurl.com/yqzf99 (a recent advance in laser technology called “ultrashort laser pulsing” might allow for much faster, more explosive chemical reaction times for laser induced chemical reactions).
- http://tinyurl.com/3bmlod (directed energy laser guns developed by Raytheon is a technology that may have been used to trigger chemical explosions in the WTC towers on 9/11/01).
6. It is evident just from the video footage alone that WTC 7 was purposely and skillfully destroyed by a different mechanism from the WTC towers because, unlike the WTC towers which were turned to dust from the top down, WTC 7 was destroyed from the bottom up and a relatively large amount of the building survived as a heap pile. The destruction of WTC 7 is not counted here as evidence of crimes against humanity, however, because nobody was killed in its purposeful destruction.
Source:
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html
This is only a partial list and does not include additional evidence that can and should be obtained through the investigative powers of the United States Congress.
Sincerely,
H. Nicole Young, Ph.D., Representative of the Citizens of the United States of America (ROC-USA)
hn_young@yahoo.com
This letter also posted at: http://shoes4industry.blogspot.com
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter, and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.~Abraham Lincoln
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I am not sure which links are still working or not, over four years later, and I am not going to check them because it's time for me to move on from this and "work the straw" now, though I still stand by everything I said in my original letter.
ReplyDeleteBriefly, this is my best guess, based on the very limited evidence and data, as to how it was done, by whom, and why. Kinda don't care enough about changing minds at this late stage to elaborate more than just bullet points. The world is saved -- my job is done.
Do your own research if you are still interested in finding the truth for yourself. Don't rely on what anybody says, including me.
How:
-- Special drones were flown by remote control into the WTC towers.
-- A mistake was made with the second plane in that it was supposed to hit the steel core of the WTC building, but it missed to the right just enough to have the (specially enhanced) nose of plane fly right through the building (i.e., through two steel facades, which any regular, light-weight aluminum nose of any standard commercial airline would not be able to do, IMHO) with relatively litte damage done. Hope you can find all the video footage showing this now, though. Last time I checked, I was not able to get to most of those links in my letter. So be it.
-- It is physically impossible for gravity alone to account for all the energy required to turn the WTC towers into dust. The extra added energy came from nanothermite, a highly stable (yet very powerful when detonated) white powder (which is not to be confused with regular thermite -- an entirely different beast). Nanothermite could have easily been applied to the entire steel interior of both WTC towers for years under the guise of being the fire-proof coating that was constantly being applied to the steel core of both WTC buildings throughout their lifetimes -- and with only one or two people knowing it, which is a helluva lot less that "19 Arabs plus all their buddies living in caves in Afghanistan."
Who: Why, the cheney/rove kkk neo-nazi blackwater army party, of course. Who else? This was probably the most dangerous self-loathing closeted gay duo since hitler/goebbels -- that is, back before the world was saved some time in 2007/2008.
Why: Directed energy technology is on the verge of maturing to the point where we (humans) will be able to harness and focus the sun's energy so effieciently that energy will be virtually free. Well, you can just imagine what that will do to the price of oil and to the pocketbooks of all the oil people, among other huge changes that are coming -- it is hoped all for the better. So something was needed to artificially inflate oil prices for the next few decades before it becomes virtually worthless -- while simulaneously killing off large populations of citizens of oil-dependent countries [yes, people, believe it or not, it is now a *global economy*, meaning that, at least for now (until gay marriage is legalized world-wide and self-loathing, angry gay men are no longer created by homophobia and therefore they no longer run the world with their hatred and resentment) it's powerful, manipulative (mostly self-loathing closeted gay) slimeballs against lowly, naive schmucks like us, regardless of nationality, race, country or creed - so please, just stop it already with all the "Christian-USA is gonna kick your Muslim-Arab arse" BS and grow a brain].
People summary:
ReplyDeleteDr. Judy Wood: right about it being physically impossible to turn the WTC towers to dust from gravity alone; right that directed energy technology could possibly turn concrete to dust; wrong that directed energy technology can turn steel to dust. Turning steel to dust is a chemical process requiring a chemical reaction (i.e., nanothermite), not a physcial process, which is what directed energy technology is. I believe Dr. Judy Wood is a puppet for Raytheon, which is trying to pretend (secretly to world leaders) that it has developed a high powered directed energy weapon that can turn steel buildings to dust. Well, there you go, people, your taxpayer money hard at work paying off slimeballs in the defense industry who are worse than snake oil salesmen. So be it. This wouldn't happen if women made up at least 50% of Congress -- men are sooo stupid when it comes to snake oil, especially the bang bang, boom boom kind of snake oil.
Dr. Stephen Jones: right that it was thermite; wrong that it was regular thermite, leaving "pools of molten steel" at the base of the buildings. It was nanothermite and Dr. Jones was put into play purposely (probably by Raytheon again) to get people off the nanothermite trail by making sure the word "thermite" wuold be associated with idiots like him running around making idiotic false claims (on purpose in his case).
Hologram people: right that standard commercial airliners did not crash into the buildings; wrong that it was all smoke and mirrors and image fakery. It was drones.
The end.
And remember, that's Dr. Crazy Nutjob to you.